Below is the exchange between Tom Murphy and Rob Kall (editor)
Dear editor:
I am disappointed that you chose to run the article "Never Again" by Norma Sherry. It had this very troubling paragraph:"Rumors abounded after 911 that mysteriously Jews didn't show up to work that day, that 911 was retribution to the U.S. for their misguided support of the Zionist country, Israel. However outlandish and absurd these contradictions to the reality may be, there remain individuals willing to propagate such falsities for the mere chance to rid us of the bothersome, loathsome Jew."
I have contacted Ms. Sherry and she says she "doesn't believe that 911 had anything to do with Israel."
This is an outrageous statement since one of the motives for the 9/11 attack was indeed anger at Israeli polices. I have explained this to Ms. Sherry but clearly she wants to deny the reality of the motives and the fact that Bush lied to the nation about why we were attacked.
New Priorities Council is working hard to set the record straight and expose President Bush as a liar. Please don't undermine our efforts by spreading misinformation. Please provide the correct information, posting Ms. Sherry's article is irresponsible and disrespectful. I have also written an article about Bush's 9/11 lie: Bush lied about 9/11 terrorists' motives
Tom Murphy

Rob Kall responds:
I discussed your correspondence with Norma Sherry. The bottom line is she wrote an opinion piece. She’s entitled to her opinion. You’re entitled to yours.

You have the right to find a venue willing to publish your perspective
Rob Kall
www.OpEdNews.com

Tom Murphy writes back:

Everyone is entitled to an opinion. What Ms. Sherry is [doing is ] wrongly labeling people as anti-Semites.
You don't think it is extreme to claim that those that say 9/11 was in response to US support of Israeli polices are propagating falsities for the mere chance to rid us of the bothersome, loathsome Jew? AS I have pointed out, you don't publish anything. You didn't publish my original e-mail, can you tell me why? You don't think readers would benefit from knowing that speaking about 9/11 motives is not "anti-Semitism" regardless of what Ms. Sherry claims? From your tone and what you have written I take it you are not willing to publish an opinion piece by myself that speaks the truth and doesn't label anyone? Here is my article about Bush: Bush lied about 9/11 terrorists' motives
-Tom Murphy

Rob Kall responds:

Take what you’ve written, cut it to 600 words and I’ll seriously consider publishing it.
 
Rob Kall   
www.OpEdNews.com
Tom Murphy responds:
Dear Mr. Kall:
Having never counted the words in my article or in Ms. Sherry's article I had assumed that you were being sincere and fair. I have been working on my article but I started have difficulty trimming my article down to 600 words so I went and did a word count on Ms. Sherry's article. Her article is 1694 words. I have counted the words in a few other articles on your site and haven't found any that have been cut to 600 words. Do you know what I felt like this morning when I discovered the word counts?
I have been civil and decent with you. Can you explain to me why you feel it necessary to treat me like this? I also notice that you haven't published our e-mail exchange in your letters section and you didn't respond when I asked you why. You didn't address the issues I raised and instead you give me flippant response. I lived in New York City and was there on 9/11, and so was my sister who was running for her life in tears across the Brooklyn Bridge.
I take great offense at how you have handled this issue. Ms Sherry's slander against those that try to inform fellow Americans why we are being targeted is disgusting and yet you publish it. You of course have a free speech right to publish any garbage you desire. You and Ms. Sherry clearly have a strong desire to spread deceitful articles and smear Americans who want the truth. You are not treating us fairly. Considering the brutal seriousness of 9/11 what you two are doing is obnoxious. You are treating us disrespectfully. What conclusions do you think my readers will draw from what you and Ms. Sherry are doing and the message you two are sending?
Sincerely,
Tom Murphy

P. S. Why don't you show some loyalty to America and you write an article about the motives for 9/11? And no, you don't have to cut it down to 600 words, this is far too important for such a totally unnecessary and ridiculous restriction. Here is some background info:
The motives for 9/11 are no mystery. The motives have been stated by several people clearly and repeatedly for years. The terrorists are not attacking us in order to force us to convert to Islam or because we don't believe in Islam or that they don't like freedom or that they are envious.     
Note that Osama bin Laden has said why repeatedly and he says that the attacks will continue UNTIL specific foreign policies (American policy in the Middle East and its support of Israel) are stopped. He doesn't say "until you believe in Alah", none of the terrorists have ever said this or anything about attacking us because of our freedoms. It is dangerous to spread false reasons for why 9/11 happened. Please read the following for the motives for 9/11 attacks:     
"Your position against Muslims in Palestine is despicable and disgraceful.  America has no shame.  ...  We believe that the worst thieves in the world today and the worst terrorists are the Americans.  Nothing could stop you except perhaps retaliation in kind.  We do not have to differentiate between military or civilian.  As far as we are concerned, they are all targets, and this is what the fatwah says ...  .  The fatwah is general (comprehensive) and it includes all those who participate in, or help the Jewish occupiers in killing Muslims. " - Osama bin Laden May 1998     
"For over half a century, Muslims in Palestine have been slaughtered and assaulted and robbed of their honor and of their property.  Their houses have been blasted, their crops destroyed.  And the strange thing is that any act on their part to avenge themselves or to lift the injustice befalling them causes great agitation in the United Nations which hastens to call for an emergency meeting only to convict the victim and to censure the wronged and the tyrannized whose children have been killed and whose crops have been destroyed and whose farms have been pulverized " - Osama bin Laden May 1998
     "The International Islamic Front for Jihad against the U.S. and Israel has issued a crystal-clear fatwa calling on the Islamic nation to carry on jihad aimed at liberating holy sites. The nation of Muhammad has responded to this appeal. If the instigation for jihad against the Jews and the Americans in order to liberate Al-Aksa Mosque and the Holy Ka'aba Islamic shrines in the Middle East is considered a crime, then let history be a witness that I am a criminal." - Osama bin Laden May 1999     
"We swore that America wouldn't live in security until we live it truly in Palestine . This showed the reality of America, which puts Israel's interest above its own people's interest. America won't get out of this crisis until it gets out of the Arabian Peninsula , and until it stops its support of Israel." -Osama bin Laden, October 2001     
A German friend of Mohammed Atta(the hijacker pilot who flew into WTC) is quoted as describing him as "most imbued actually about Israeli politics in the region and about US protection of these Israeli politics in the region. And he was to a degree personally suffering from that."     
These facts point to a motive for attacking the WTC in 2001 that is consistent with the motive expressed by terrorists in a letter sent to the New York Times after the 1993 bombing attack of the WTC,  "We declare our responsibility for the explosion on the mentioned building.  This action was done in response for the American political, economical, and military support to Israel the state of terrorism and to the rest of the dictator countries in the region."      
It is also the same motive that Mir Aimal Kasi had for killing CIA employees Frank Darling and Lansing Bennett outside CIA headquarters in Langley,Virginia in 1993 . Mir Aimal Kasi said, "What I did was a retaliation against the US government for American policy in the Middle East and its support of Israel ." Mir Aimal Kasi once professed a love for this country, his uncle testified.  "He always say that 'I like America, I love America and I want to go there,'" Amanullah Kasi said at a sentencing hearing for his nephew, Mir Aimal Kasi . Kasi's roommate, who had reported him missing after the shootings, told police that Kasi would get incensed watching CNN when he heard how Muslims were being treated. After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Kasi said he did not approve of the attack on the World Trade Center because innocent were killed. He understood, however, the attack on the Pentagon, the symbol of government might.     
The shoe bomber (Richard Reid) has said:"The reason for me sending you (a document he calls his "will") is so you can see that I didn't do this act out of ignorance nor did I just do it because I want to die, but rather because I see it as a duty upon me to help remove the oppressive American forces from the Muslim land and that this is the only way for us to do so as we do not have other means to fight them."
Abdullah Azzam authored Join the Caravan and he writes, "We then are calling upon the Muslims and urging them to proceed to fight, for many reasons, at the head of which are the following:" Then he lists 16 reasons. NONE of them state that the reason is just for the sake of attacking non-believers.In fact the first reason is: "1. In order that the Disbelievers do not dominate.""Do not dominate"  Note that he does not write "just because they are disbelievers" or "in order to make them believe." NONE of the 16 reasons say "fight to make disbelievers into Muslims"In fact Osama bin Laden addressed the lying about motives for 9/11:
"... the Mujahideen saw the black gang of thugs in the White House hiding the Truth, and their stupid and foolish leader, who is elected and supported by his people, denying reality and proclaiming that we (the Mujahideen) were striking them because we were jealous of them (the Americans), whereas the reality is that we are striking them because of their evil and injustice in the whole of the Islamic World, especially in Iraq and Palestine and their occupation of the Land of the Two Holy Sanctuaries." -Osama Bin Laden , February 14 , 2003
in that same statement Osama bin Laden once again listed the motives: " ... in 1995 , the explosion in Riyadh took place, killing four Americans, in a clear message from the people of that region displaying their rejection and opposition to the American policy of bankrolling the Jews and occupying the Land of the Two Holy Sanctuaries. The following year, another explosion in Al-Khobar killed 19 Americans and wounded more than 400 of them, prompting them to move their bases from the cities to the desert . Then in 1998 , the Mujahideen warned America to cease their support to the Jews and to leave the Land of the Two Holy Sanctuaries, but the enemy refused to heed this warning, so the Mujahideen, with the ability from Allah , smashed them with two mighty smashes in East Africa . Then again America was warned, but she refused to pay attention to the warnings, so the Mujahideen destroyed the American Destroyer, the USS Cole, in Aden, in a martyrdom operation, striking a solid blow to the face of the American military and at the same time, exposing the Yemeni Government as American agents, similar to all the countries in the region." -Osama bin Laden February 14, 2003

Rob Kall responds:

Norma has written numerous articles for me, and was writing for others before she started with me. Do you have any published writing credits? I often start working with writers, offering them a shorter piece. This is an editor’s prerogative. Writing short is more difficult than writing long, which can go in all kinds of different directions and get sloppy.

I was willing to look at a short, focused, tightly written article from you. Most publishers on the internet don’t give writers the time of day. I am giving you much more time than most editors.

I did check your site, using alexa.com. What readers are you talking about? Your site doesn’t even show up on alexa at all. Even sites that get five visitors a day show up.

Bottom line, you don’t insult an editor. Go send your stuff to neo-nazi sites. They’ll like it. I don’t need to work with someone who gives me abuse.

Rob Kall

Note: See what Rob Kall resorts to? Now he is trying to smear me as a neo-nazi. This guy will stoop this low : he doesn't want Americans to know why they are targets of terrorism, he doesn't what the motives of 9/11 known, so he labels facts he doesn't like as "neo-nazi". Do you see the outrageousness of Mr. Kall's actions? Stating the motives for 9/11 is now "neo-nazi". That is an underhanded way to prevent the truth from coming out.